Evaluation of the possibilities of adapting a constant volume combustion chamber for research on ignition of hypergolic propellants under low and high-pressure conditions
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Power and Aeronautical Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology.
 
 
Publication date: 2018-05-01
 
 
Combustion Engines 2018,173(2), 9-13
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
In this study, the adaptation possibilities of a constant volume combustion chamber (CVCC) for research on the ignition of hypergolic propellants are presented. The application of hypergolic bipropellants and crucial parameters regarding their ignition behaviour are discussed. The initial studies on ignition delay measurements presented here does not cover the whole range of conditions present in practical systems where hypergolic ignition occurs. In the study, a need for an evaluation of the influence of pressure on the ignition delay was indicated as the reason to conduct research on hypergolic ignition in low and high-pressure environments. Moreover, the study reviews the state-of-the-art experimental methods of investigating the ignition under atmospheric, low and high-pressure conditions, including those utilizing a constant volume combustion chamber. The drop test was pointed out as the most commonly used method; this makes it advantageous in terms of comparing the results with those obtained by other researchers. Therefore, the drop test was selected as a method to be used in a CVCC. The test rig developed here was designed based on a CVCC initially designed for diesel sprays’ visualization in high-pressure conditions. All the required modifications, especially the design of the oxidizer dosing unit, are presented in the study.
 
REFERENCES (18)
1.
CONG, Y., ZHANG, T., LI, T. et al. Propulsive performance of a hypergolic H2O2/kerosene bipropellant. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2004, 20(1), 83-86.
 
2.
CORBETT, A., SEAMANS, T., DAWSON, B. et al. Hy-pergolic ignition at reduced pressures. Edwards Air Force Base, CA: AFRPL-R-64-175, 1964.
 
3.
DAMBACH, E., CHO, K., POURPOINT, T. et al. Ignition of advanced hypergolic propellants. 46th AIAA/ASME/ SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 2010.
 
4.
Falcon 9 SpaceX. www.spacex.com/falcon9.
 
5.
HOLTZMANN, R. Chemical rockets. Marcel Dekker, New York 1969.
 
6.
HURLBERT, E., APPLEWHITE, J., NGUYEN, T. et al. Nontoxic orbital maneuvering and reaction control systems for reusable spacecraft. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 1998, 14(5), 676-687.
 
7.
HURLBERT, E., SUN, J., ZHANG, B. Instability phenomena in earth storable bipropellant rocket engines. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics. 1995, 169, 122.
 
8.
Hypergolic Propellants Laboratory – High Velocity Drop Impact Experiment. engineering.purdue.edu/Hypergol/high_velocity_impact/index.html.
 
9.
KANG, H., LEE, E., KWON, S. Suppression of hard start for nontoxic hypergolic thruster using H2O2 oxidizer. Journal of Propulsion and Power. 2017, 33(5), 1111-1117.
 
10.
LEWIŃSKA, J., KAPUSTA, Ł.J. Analysis of the micro-structure of the fuel spray atomized by marine injector. Combustion Engines. 2017, 169(2), 120-124.
 
11.
LEY, W. Rockets, missiles, and space travel. Viking Press, New York 1951.
 
12.
NATAN, B., PERTEGHELLA, V., SOLOMON, Y. Hy-pergolic ignition of oxidizers and fuels by fuel gelation and suspension of reactive or catalyst particles. 46th AIAA/ ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit 2010.
 
13.
POURPOINT, T., ANDERSON, W. Hypergolic reaction mechanisms of catalytically promoted fuels with rocket grade hydrogen peroxide. Combustion Science and Technol-ogy. 2007, 179(10), 2107-2133.
 
14.
SEAMANS, T., DAWSON, B. Hypergolic ignition at reduced pressures. Edwards Air Force Base, CA: AFRPL-TR-64-175, 1967.
 
15.
SEAMANS, T., VANPEE, M., AGOSTA, V. Development of a fundamental model of hypergolic ignition in space-ambient engines. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. 1967, 5(9), 1616-1624.
 
16.
SUTTON, G. History of liquid propellant rocket engines. Alexandria. VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. 2006.
 
17.
WANG, S., THYNELL, S. Experimental investigation of pressure effect on ignition delay of monomethylhydrazine, 1,1‐dimethylhydrazine, tetramethylethylenediamine and 2‐dimethylaminoethylazide with nitric acid. 8th U. S. National Combustion Meeting 2013.
 
18.
ZARBO, N., BELAL, H., POURPOINT, T. Effect of water and humidity on hypergolic propellant ignition and combustion. 51st AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference 2015.
 
 
CITATIONS (3):
1.
Pressure and temperature effect on hypergolic ignition delay of triglyme-based fuel with hydrogen peroxide
Łukasz Kapusta, Łukasz Boruc, Jan Kindracki
Fuel
 
2.
Effects of oxidizing additives on the physical properties and ignition performance of hydrogen peroxide-based hypergolic propellants
Seonghyeon Park, Kyounghwan Lee, Hongjae Kang, Youngchul Park, Jongkwang Lee
Acta Astronautica
 
3.
Reasonable testing of hypergolic fuels
S.V. Khomik, S.V. Usachev, S.P. Medvedev, A.N. Ivantsov, S.V. Stovbun, V.N. Mikhalkin, G.L. Agafonov
Acta Astronautica
 
eISSN:2658-1442
ISSN:2300-9896
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top