Simplification of the procedure for testing common rail fuel injectors
| 1 | Katedra Eksploatacji Pojazdów, Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie, Poland |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Tomasz STOECK
Katedra Eksploatacji Pojazdów, Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie, Al. Piastów 19, 70-310, Szczecin, Poland
Katedra Eksploatacji Pojazdów, Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie, Al. Piastów 19, 70-310, Szczecin, Poland
Publication date: 2020-03-30
Submission date: 2020-01-30
Final revision date: 2020-02-20
Acceptance date: 2020-02-20
Combustion Engines 2020;180(1):52–56
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The paper presents a simplified methodology for generating the characteristic curve of fuel doses for common rail injectors, which consists in limiting the number of measurements on the test bench and calculating missing data using predefined (array) functions of the Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. This allows checking the method of fuel delivery in a wide spectrum of predefined pressures and atomiser opening times, while reducing the arduousness and time-consumption of the active experiment phase. The proposed solution is particularly useful in problematic situations when standard manufacturer's tests, referred only to selected work points, make it impossible to clearly assess the technical condition of the injector.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
ABRAMEK, K.F., STOECK, T., OSIPOWICZ T. Statistical Evaluation of the corrosive wear of fuel injector elements used in common rail systems. Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2015, 61(2), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme....
2.
BUSZ, W., WALASZYK, A. Optimize the testing process common rail fuel injectors. Combustion Engines. 2015, 162(3), 978-981.
3.
CHENEY, W., KINCAID, D., Numerical Mathematics and Computing (7th Ed.). Books/Cole Publishing Company. 2012, Pacific Grove.
4.
GAUTSCHI, W. Interpolation before and after Lagrange. Rendiconti del Seminario Matematico Università e Politecnico di Torino. 2012, 70(4), 347-368.
5.
GONET, M. Excel w obliczeniach naukowych i technicznych. Wydawnictwo Helion. 2010, Gliwice.
6.
HOFFMAN, J.D., Numerical methods for engineers and scientists. Marcel Dekker, Inc. 2001, New York-Basel.
7.
JUŚCIŃSKI, S., PIEKARSKI, W., CHOMIK, Z. Analysis of injection systems types used in agricultural machines. Agricultural Engineering. 2017, 21(4), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1515/agrice....
8.
KARPIUK, W., BOR, W., SMOLEC, R. Possibilities of analysis of condition and repair of common-rail system injectors. Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport. 2018, 23(4), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.5604/123140....
9.
KARRIS, S.T. Numerical analysis using MATLAB® and Excel® (3th Ed.). Orchard Publications. 2007, Berkeley.
10.
KLUCZYK, M., GRZĄDZIELA, A. Marine diesel engine common rail injectors monitoring with vibration parameters. Diagnostyka. 2019, 19(3), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.29354/diag/....
11.
KLUCZYK, M., GRZĄDZIELA, A. Vibration diagnostics of common rail injectors. Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology. 2017, 16(4), 177-184. https://doi.org/10.1080/204641....
12.
KNEBA, Z., STRASZAK, P., JAKÓBCZYK, K. The effectiveness of fault detection in common rail injectors examination methods. Combustion Engines. 2017, 170(3), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.19206/CE-20...
13.
OLSZOWSKI, S., CHOJNACKI, T., OLSZOWSKI, T. Nieprawidłowa praca wtryskiwaczy common rail pomimo pozytywnego wyniku badania. Autobusy – Technika, Eksploatacja, Systemy Transportowe. 2017, 6, 1003-1007.
14.
OSIPOWICZ, T., ABRAMEK, K.F. Diagnosing methods common rail fuel injectors. Combustion Engines. 2017, 168(1), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.19206/CE-20....
15.
OSIPOWICZ, T., KOWALEK, S. Evaluation of Modern Diesel Engine Fuel Injectors. TEKA – Commission of Motorization and Energetics in Agriculture. 2014, 14(3), 83-87.
16.
REIF, K. (Ed.). Automotive Mechatronics. Bosch Professional Automotive Information. Springer Fach-medien. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-....
17.
STOECK, T. Application of the experimental design technique in fuel dose adjustment of common rail injector. Combustion Engines. 2019, 179(4), 210-215. https://doi.org/10.19206/CE-20...
18.
STOECK, T., OSIPOWICZ, T. Analiza uszkodzeń wtryskiwaczy Common Rail firmy Bosch stosowanych w silnikach wysokoprężnych pojazdów użytkowych. Logistyka. 2013, 6, 723-727.
19.
STOECK, T., OSIPOWICZ, T. Przyczyny tworzenia się osadów we wtryskiwaczach Common Rail. Autobusy – Technika, Eksploatacja, Systemy Transportowe. 2016, 8, 139-141.
20.
VASILIU, D., VASILIU, G.C., RĂDULESCU, A. et al. Predicting the dynamic performance of the fuel injectors by numerical simulation. Scientific Bulletin. Series C: Electrical engineering and Computer Science. 2018, 78(4), 173-188. University Politehnica of Bucharest.
21.
WALKENBACH, J. Excel 2013 Formulas. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2013, Hoboken, New Jersey.
22.
YORDANOV, N., HADJIEW, K., STANKOW, E. Experimental simulation of common rail electromagnetic injectors wearing. Machines, Technologies, Materials. 2018, 12(4), 208-211.
