Comparative analysis of pollutants emission by classical and distributed propulsions applied on the AOS motor glider
More details
Hide details
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszow University of Technology.
Publication date: 2019-10-01
Combustion Engines 2019,179(4), 102–106
Comparative analysis of harmful compounds emission of classical and distributed propulsions applied on the AOS motor glider, taking into account the perspective of the development of hybrid propulsions. A novel path is indicated by so-called distributed aircraft propulsion. The advantages and disadvantages of this type of solutions are presented, as well as the conceptual design of the distributed propulsion for the AOS 71 motor glider. In the paper there were compared the emissions of harmful compounds generated by a hybrid power unit developed for the airframe of AOS 71 motor glider – traditional propulsion, so-called focused (one-propeller) and dispersed propulsion (multi-propelled). Functional diagrams of both types of propulsions solutions are presented. Construction and aerodynamic constraints of both propulsions are discussed and comparative analysis is made. In the traditional version of the propulsion (so-called focused propulsion). the propeller is driven by an Emrax 228 electric engine with effective parameters: N = 55 kW, M = 120 Nm. The power source is a battery set with a capacity of 16 Ah and a range extender powered by a LCR 407ti rotating piston engine with maximum power of 28 kW. In the variant of the distributed propulsion. Ten electric engines of AXI 8120 type were used to drive small propellers arranged along the wingspan. The power source in this variant is analogous to the variant with the Emrax electric engine. For the adopted variant of the flight mission of the motor glider. a flight trajectory model was developed, which was used to determine the load of the power unit. In laboratory conditions. emission tests of both propulsions were conducted. The results are summarized in charts and discussed in the conclusions.
ALEX, M. et al. Drag reduction through distributed electric propulsion. Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Atlanta 16-20 June 2014.
ANDERSON, J. Introduction to flight. McGraw Hill Book Company. San Francisco 2003.
BOJOI, R., BOGGERO, H.. et al. Multiphase drives for hybrid-electric propulsion in light aircrafts: a viable solution. Conference: 2018 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion (SPEEDAM). DOI: 10.1109/SPEEDAM.2018.8445241.
BUKOWSKI, J., ŁUCJANEK, W. Napęd śmigłowy teoria i konstrukcja. MON. Warszawa 1984.
GEISS, I., VOIT-NITSCHMANN, R. Sizing of fuel-based energy systems for electric aircrafts. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G-Journal of Aerospace Engineering. 2017, 231. DOI: 10.1177/0954410017721254.
FAHIM, M. An overview of double-bar single-whee rotary combustion engine. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 2019, 11(2), 1-13. DOI: 10.1177/1687814019828074.
HENDERSON, R.P., MARTINS, J.R.R.A., PEREZ, R.E. Aircraft conceptual design for optimal environmental performance. The Aeronautical Journal. 2012, 116(1175), 1-22.
HARTMAN, E., BIEDERMAN, D. The aerodynamic characteristic of full-scale propellers. NACA Report No. 640, 1938.
JAKUBOWSKI, R., ORKISZ, M. A review of selected alternative propulsion systems for UAV applications. Zeszyty Naukowe/Wyższa Szkoła Oficerska Sił Powietrznych Dęblin. 2015, 231.
KOTLARZ, W. Turbinowe zespoły napędowe źródłem skażeń powietrza na lotniskach wojskowych. Wyższa Szkoła Oficerska Sił Powietrznych. Dęblin 2003.
MARIANOWSKI, J., FRĄCZEK, W., CZARNOCKI, F. Założenia podstawowe dla projektu motoszybowca AOS-H2. (not publish).
MARIANOWSKI, J., TOMASIEWICZ, J., CZARNOCKI, F. Analiza masowa motoszybowca AOS-H2. (not publish).
PAWLAK, M. Metoda modelowania emisji szkodliwych i toksycznych składników spalin turbinowych silników odrzutowych samolotów pasażerskich w warunkach przelotowych. Wyd. Uniwersytetu Morskiego w Gdyni. Gdynia 2019.
ROSKAM, J. Airplane Aerodynamics and Performance, DARcorporation. Kansas 2016.
SINGH, V. Perceptions of emission reduction potential in air transport: a structural equation modeling approach. Environment Systems and Decisions. 2016, 36(4), 377-403.
WANKEL AG, Wankel engine manual.
MODEL MOTORS S. R. O., (accessed 2019.08.05)
EMRAX d.o.o. , (accessed 2019.08.05)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, (accessed 2019.08.11)
Analysis of the Application of Distributed Propulsion to the AOS H2 Motor Glider
Michał Kuźniar, Marek Orkisz
Journal of KONES
Numerical Analysis of the Influence of Distributed Propulsion System on the Increase of the Lift Force Coefficient
Michal Kuzniar, Arkadiusz Bednarz, Marek Orkisz
AIAA Propulsion and Energy 2020 Forum