Application of ChatGPT in the generation of a numerical performance model of a turbofan engine
 
More details
Hide details
1
Aerospace Technology Department, Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland
 
These authors had equal contribution to this work
 
 
Submission date: 2025-05-16
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-06-30
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-10-23
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-01-15
 
 
Corresponding author
Robert Jakubowski   

Aerospace Technology Department, Rzeszów University of Technology, al. Powstańców Warszawy 8, 35-959, Rzeszów, Poland
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This paper presents a study on the application of ChatGPT 4.0 in developing a numerical model for the performance analysis of a turbofan engine. The modeling process began with general queries regarding numerical approaches to engine simulation. The initial model proposed by ChatGPT appeared plausible but contained significant conceptual errors. Through iterative dialogue and refinement, these errors were gradually identified and corrected, ultimately resulting in a valid engine model. This intermediate model included two rotating components (fan and core spool) and assumed an ideal gas with distinct thermodynamic properties in the cold and hot sections of the engine. Based on this model, ChatGPT successfully generated numerical code for implementation in the MATLAB environment, handling this task with high accuracy and flexibility. Further efforts focused on extending the model to include air extraction for turbine cooling, internal engine bleeds, and the application of a semi-perfect gas model to describe the working fluid more realistically. In these more advanced areas, ChatGPT’s performance declined significantly. Despite prompting and corrective guidance, it was unable to produce a fully functional and physically accurate implementation of the enhanced model. The study concludes that while ChatGPT demonstrates strong capabilities in translating well-defined physical models into numerical code, especially within MATLAB, it remains unreliable in constructing or modifying complex thermodynamic models without significant user oversight. Nonetheless, its use can significantly accelerate the implementation phase of numerical engine modeling when guided by an experienced user.
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Bednarz A, Kabalyk K, Jakubowski R, Bartłomowicz R. Numerical study on sensitivity of turbofan engine performance to blade count of centrifugal compressor impeller. Energies. 2023;16(14):5251. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1614....
 
2.
Catana RM, Dediu G. Analytical calculation model of the TV3-117 turboshaft working regimes based on experimental data. Appl Sci. 2023;13(19):10720. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131....
 
3.
CFM International. CFM56. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....
 
4.
Cumpsty N, Heyes A. Jet propulsion: a simple guide to the aerodynamics and thermodynamic design and performance of jet engines. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO978....
 
5.
Deng W, Xu Y, Ni M, et al. Multi-fidelity simulation of gas turbine overall performance by directly coupling high-fidelity models of multiple rotating components. J Therm Sci. 2024;33:1357-1378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630....
 
6.
Ege DN, Øvrebø HH, Stubberud V, Berg MF, Elverum C, Steinert M et al. ChatGPT as an inventor: eliciting the strengths and weaknesses of current large language models against humans in engineering design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing. 2025;39:e6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S08900....
 
7.
Guha A. An efficient generic method for calculating the properties of combustion products. P I Mech Eng A-J Power Energy. 2001;215(3):375-387. https://doi.org/10.1243/095765....
 
8.
Hill PG, Peterson CR. Mechanics and thermodynamics of propulsion. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley 1965.
 
9.
Jakubowski R. Evaluation of performance properties of two combustor turbofan engine. Eksploat Niezawodn. 2015;17(4):575-581. https://doi.org/10.17531/ein.2....
 
10.
Jakubowski R, Bednarz A, Rogalski Ł. Study of the effects of heat exchanger location on turbofan engine performance. Adv Sci Technol Res J. 2024;18(4):355-368. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998....
 
11.
Jakubowski R, Jakliński P. A practical approach to modeling and performance analysis of a turboshaft engine using Matlab. Appl Sci. 2024;14(23):11373. https://doi.org/10.3390/app142....
 
12.
Kabalyk K, Bednarz A, Kantyka K. Fatigue safety factor of a transonic centrifugal compressor impeller subject to blade thickness. Scientific Reports. 2025;15:18693. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598....
 
13.
Kabashkin I, Misnevs B, Zervina O. Artificial intelligence in aviation: new professionals for new technologies. Appl Sci. 2023;13(21):11660. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132....
 
14.
Kozakiewicz A, Ludwiczak A. Analysis of nitrogen oxide emissions generated by the F100-PW-229 turbine aircraft engine, performed using the gasturb software. Problems of Mechatronics Armament Aviation Safety Engineering. 2025;16(1):9-20. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.300....
 
15.
Krus P. Large language model in aircraft system design. Proceedings of the 34th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences; 2024. Florence. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=....
 
16.
Kulczycki A, Przysowa R, Białecki T, Gawron B, Jasiński R, Merkisz J et al. Empirical modeling of synthetic fuel combustion in a small turbofan. Energies. 2024;17(11):2622. https://doi.org/10.3390/en1711....
 
17.
Kuźniar M, Pawlak M, Orkisz M. Comparison of pollutants emission for hybrid aircraft with traditional and multi-propeller distributed propulsion. Sustainability. 2022;14(22):15076. https://doi.org/10.3390/su1422....
 
18.
Maciorowski D, Ludwiczak A, Kozakiewicz A. Hydrogen, the future of aviation. Combustion Engines. 2024;197(2):126-131. https://doi.org/10.19206/CE-17....
 
19.
Loryś SM, Orkisz M. Neural network approach to compressor modelling with surge margin consideration. Archives of Thermodynamics. 2022;43(1):89-108. https://doi.org/10.24425/ather....
 
20.
Majka A, Muszyńska-Pałys J. Analysis of the performance of an aircraft powered by hybrid propulsion. Combustion Engines. 2023;193(2):45-51. https://doi.org/10.19206/CE-16....
 
21.
Marszałek N. Performance analysis of turbofan engine with additional combustion chamber fueled by alternative fuel. Combustion Engines. 2019;179(4):249-253. https://doi.org/10.19206/CE-20....
 
22.
Marszałek N. The impact of thermodynamics parameters of turbofan engine with ITB on its performance. Combustion Engines. 2020;182(3):16-22. https://doi.org/10.19206/CE-20....
 
23.
Mattingly JD, Boyer KM. Elements of propulsion: gas turbines and rockets. 2nd ed. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2016.
 
24.
McBride BJ, Zehe MJ, Gordon S. NASA Glenn coefficients for calculating thermodynamic properties of individual species. Cleveland, OH: NASA Glenn Research Center 2002.
 
25.
Muchowski R, Gubernat SM. Influence of axial compressor model simplification and mesh density on surge margin evaluation. Adv Sci Technol Res J. 2021;15(3):243-253. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998....
 
26.
Pasieka M, Grzesik N, Kuźma K. Simulation modeling of fuzzy logic controller for aircraft engines. Int J Comput. 2017;16:27-33. https://doi.org/10.47839/ijc.1....
 
27.
Pawlak M, Kuźniar M. Performance and emission of the aircraft with hybrid propulsion during take-off operation cycle. Adv Sci Technol Res J. 2024;18(1):155-166. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998....
 
28.
Pierson KC, Ha MJ. Usage of ChatGPT for engineering design and analysis tool development. AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum. 2024; Orlando, FL. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024....
 
29.
Pradas Gómez A, Krus P, Panarotto M, Isaksson O. Large language models. Proceedings of the Design Society. 2024;4:2197-206. https://doi.org/10.1017/pds.20....
 
30.
Pradas Gómez A, Panarotto M, Isaksson O. Evaluation of different large language model agent frameworks for design engineering tasks. Proceedings of the NordDesign 2024; 2024; Reykjavik, Iceland. Glasgow, UK: The Design Society. 2024:693-702. https://doi.org/10.35199/NORDD....
 
31.
Romagnosi L, Li YC, Mezine M, Teixeira, M, Vilmin S, Anker JE et al. Methodology for steady and unsteady full-engine simulations. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2019 Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition. Phoenix, USA, 17–21 June 2019.
 
32.
Timperley LR, Berthoud L, Snider C, Tryfonas T. Assessment of large language models for use in generative design of model based spacecraft system architectures. J Eng Des. 2025;36(4):550-570. https://doi.org/10.1080/095448....
 
33.
Ventosa-Molina J, Lange M, Mailach R, Fröhlich, J. Study of relative endwall motion effects in a compressor cascade through direct numerical simulations. ASME J Turbomach. 2021;143(1):011005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049....
 
34.
Wang L, Chou J, Zhou X, Tien A, Baumgartner DM. AviationGPT: a large language model for the aviation domain. AIAA SciTech. 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv....
 
35.
Wygonik P. Dobór zespołu napędowego do samolotu wielozadaniowego według kryterium zadania lotniczego (in Polish). Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej. Rzeszów 2024.
 
eISSN:2658-1442
ISSN:2300-9896
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top