An experimental analysis of performance and exhaust emissions of a CRDI diesel engine operating on mixtures containing mineral and renewable components
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury.
2
School of Techno-logy and Innovation, Energy Technology, University of Vaasa.
Publication date: 2019-10-01
 
Combustion Engines 2019,179(4), 27–31
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The manuscript presents a comparative analysis of the performance and emission characteristics of a compression ignition engine equipped with a Common Rail injection system. The engine is fueled with diesel-biodiesel mixtures containing 25% and 50% share (by volume) of renewable components. Conventional diesel is used as a reference. Turkey lard and rapeseed oil are used as raw materials and subjected to the single-stage transesterification process to obtain methyl esters. The experiments are performed on a medium-duty, turbocharged, inter-cooled, Common Rail Direct Injection (CRDI) diesel engine. This study concentrates on one engine speed of 1500 rpm, typical for gen-set applications, and mid-load range from 100 Nm to 200 Nm. The scope of measurements covers the analysis of exhaust gasses concentration and engine efficiency parameters. In addition, the in-cylinder pressure measurements are performed in order to provide insight into the differences in combustion characteristics between examined fuel mixtures. The study reveals that the addition of the renewable component to fuel mixture positively affects a number of examined performance parameters as well as decreases the concentration of the examined toxic exhaust components, in the majority of cases.
 
REFERENCES (8)
1.
ARANSIOLA, E.F., OJUMU, T.V., OYEKOLA, O.O. et al. A review of current technology for biodiesel production: state of the art. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2014, 61. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.11.014.
 
2.
ABBASZAADEH, A., GHOBADIAN, B., OMIDKHAH, M.R., NAJAFI, G. Current biodiesel production technologies: a comparative review. Energy Conversion and Management. 2012, 63. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2012.02.027.
 
3.
DUDA, K., WIERZBICKI, S., ŚMIEJA, M., MIKULSKI, M. Comparison of performance and emissions of a CRDI diesel engine fuelled with biodiesel of different origin. Fuel. 2018, 212. DOI. 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.112.
 
4.
MOFIJUR, M., ATABANI, A.E., MASJUKI, H.H. et al. A study on the effects of promising edible and non-edible biodiesel feedstocks on engine performance and emissions production: a comparative evaluation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013, 23. DOI. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.03.009.
 
5.
GRABOSKI, M.S., MCCORMICK, R.L. Combustion of fat and vegetable oil derived fuels in diesel engine. Progress in Energy Combustion Science. 1998, 24(2). DOI: 10.1016/S0360-1285(97)00034-8.
 
6.
DUDA, K., PIĘTAK, A. Physicochemical properties of fuel compositions obtained from diesel fuel and different kinds of fatty raw material. Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport. 2018, 25(3). DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0012.4324.
 
7.
DUDA, K., ŚMIEJA, M., MIKULSKI, M., HUNICZ, J. Influence of biodiesel origin on the exhaust gasses concentration in compression ignition engine. Journal of KONES Powertrain and Transport. 2018, 25(3). DOI:10.5604/01.3001.0012.4325.
 
8.
MIKULSKI, M., DUDA, K., WIERZBICKI, S. Performance and emissions of a CRDI diesel engine fuelled with swine lard methyl esters diesel mixture. Fuel. 2016, 164. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.09.083.
 
eISSN:2658-1442
ISSN:2300-9896